Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:45
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Here's The Top 10 Most Expensive Pokémon Cards in Destined Rivals - IGN
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Obesity Newcomer Metsera, Up 23%, Enters The Ring With A Punch - Investor's Business Daily
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
What is the best technique for inserting a tampon into one’s anus?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Suspect in custody after 11 stabbed at Oregon homeless services provider - NBC News
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
The Ultimate Visual Guide to Protein: Here's How Much You Should Eat A Day - CNET